We all have that one friend whose seven-mornings-a-week workout routine puts yours to shame.
Even when you have the best of intentions, it’s hard to maintain that level of frequency when you’ve got work, social and family commitments to juggle. Some weeks, it’s only possible to squeeze in one or two decent fitness sessions.
However, the findings of a new study might alleviate any guilt you’re feeling about your moderate approach to exercise.
RELATED: Running too hard is worse for you than no exercise at all. Slow coaches, rejoice!
The study of UK women, published in the American Heart Association journal Circulation, sought to figure out whether out the frequency and duration of exercise has any bearing on a person’s risk of vascular health issues. Generally, physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of heart disease, strokes and blood clots.
Over a nine-year period, researchers tracked the vascular health of more than one million women aged between 50 and 64. The participants were quizzed about their exercise habits — how often and how hard they worked out — and other personal factors. (Post continues after gallery.)
Fast, high-intensity exercises
It comes as a surprise to approximately nobody that the women who exercised two to three times a week had a lower incidence of vascular health issues than those who were inactive. Physical activity is good for your body and your mind, period.
Yet a higher frequency of strenuous exercise, defined in this instance as “any work or exercise causing sweating or a fast heartbeat”, didn’t seem to offer any further health benefits for women than a moderate amount of exercise. In fact, according to the Wall Street Journal, four to seven sessions of strenuous exercise per week was associated with a higher incidence of adverse vascular effects.