By KYLIE LADD
Recently, my daughter’s primary school held a cyber-safety session aimed at grades three to six. The children were taken into the school hall and introduced to the visiting expert, a middle-aged woman who immediately asked those who used any form of social media to stand up while the rest remained seated on the floor.
My 11-year-old daughter, Cameron, dutifully did so – she has an Instagram account which she thoroughly enjoys, and occasionally also uses Kik to send messages.
I wasn’t there- no parent was- but when I heard what happened next I dearly wished I had been.
Cam and quite a few of her friends were told that what they were doing was wrong, that they were too young to have access to social media, and that their parents (and here I quote one of Cam’s classmates) “needed help with their parenting” because they must be doing a bad job.
Expert-lady should have been grateful I wasn’t there to hear that, because I would have blown my top.
I absolutely agree that it’s important to be teaching pre-teens cyber-safety skills, and I also agree that unrestricted, unmonitored access to social media is a bad idea for kids who aren’t that far past having learned to tie their shoelaces. What I don’t agree with, however, is that it should be banned altogether until the magic age of 13, when the keys to the kingdom (or Facebook at least) are handed over.