In August this year, seven-year-old Australian boy Julian Cadman was confirmed among the seven victims of a terrorist attack on Barcelona’s crowded Las Ramblas boulevard.
His mother, Jumarie (‘Jom’), was severely injured when a van careened through the tourist hot-spot, leaving the grieving woman facing months of expensive operations on her fractured legs. With this, and the costs associated with burying the little boy, family friend Scott Bowman launched an online fundraiser to help ease the Cadman’s financial burden.
“The concern we have got at the moment is their travel insurance might not cover acts of terrorism and Jom is going to have ongoing medical expenses,” Bowman told The Daily Telegraph at the time.
It’s a cold, hard reality that acts of terrorism, like that which killed little Julian, now pose a risk to those travelling to once-peaceful destinations. Yet still, most insurers won’t foot the bill should those people become caught up in the chaos.
While some may offer limited cover – say for some medical expenses – several have a blanket exclusion on any losses relating to a terrorist act or threat. In other words, they won’t pay a cent.
Campbell Fuller, General Manager Communications and Media Relations at the Insurance Council of Australia, the industry’s representative body, explained that this type of exclusion is nothing new.
“Travel insurance is designed to be a relatively low-cost product that covers travellers for everyday instances,” he told Mamamia.