As the election campaign enters its second week one of our parties over the weekend made a policy announcement with some really good ideas.
Some good ideas.
It’s a policy that will appeal to many as it absolves them of responsibility. A policy that should be put in place no matter who wins the election – but one that doesn’t go far enough.
Can your kids swim?
There were 271 deaths due to drowning in 2015 with 26 of those of preschool-aged. Via IStock.
Do they go to lessons? Do they scream the place down with their resistance or are they gung ho natural fish?
Have you given up swimming lessons in despair after week upon week of tears and tantrums? Or have you just not bothered because well, your busy and life’s crazy and swimming lessons are damn expensive.
For some families swimming lessons aren’t much of a big deal. You book the kids in, you diligently attend each week, you spend a fortune on goggles as they keep on losing them and your kids learn to swim.
For other families it’s harder. They work. There is no time. The swim centres are too far away. The kids hate the water.
They say 'It should be the schools responsibility anyway.'
These families are wrong and they're doing their children a disservice.
For other families it’s harder. They work. There is no time. The swim centres are too far away. The kids hate the water. Via iStock.
Yesterday in an election pledge Opposition Leader Bill Shorten promised $40 million to ensure swimming lessons are available in all states and all public, Catholic and independent schools. The program would include water safety lessons in the classroom and swimming lessons in the pool from 2017 with the details of the classes to be worked out in consultation with the states.
It’s a good plan. A good start. A much needed policy in an area which has been directionless for years. An area where lives have been lost, where indigenous kids and those new to Australia desperately need such programs even if it will be difficult to fit into an already over-crowded curriculum.