By MEAGHAN COOK
Miles (6) skipped out of his classroom yesterday holding aloft a yellow envelope with his name typed on the front. “It’s my report!’ he hollered to me as he met me at the school gate. “What does it say?” he asked, as we tore it open to read it.
“Um, I’m really not sure,” I said.
As part of the Australian Education Union’s (AEU) fight with the Victorian Government, teachers have been instructed not to write comments on our children’s reports. So what we held in our hands was a piece of paper with a series of dots that was supposed to tell us how Miles had gone in his first year of school.
“I think it says that you, um, have dots in all the right places,” I offered.
He was as baffled as I was.
But I question this particular method of protest, the withholding of information from parent’s about their children, as one that will help the cause of teachers.
How does not telling a parent about their child’s learning convince Mr Baillieu to deliver on his promise?
Not getting a detailed report for Miles is not just so that I can have a record of what he has achieved in prep (although that’d be nice too). It’s so that I can learn more about my child. I want to know if Miles is a visual learner, if he enjoys group work or prefers to be on his own, if he responds well to his success or is weighed down by his difficulties. The dots tell me that he’s at ‘’the expected level of achievement’’ for reading, but how did he get there? Did he have initial struggles but overcame them, or has he breezed through?