1. Rolf Harris trial
The jury in the Rolf Harris trial have returned to the judge with written questions – indicating dissent in coming to a verdict.
The questions they have asked are:
1. Can we discuss legal directions given as there seems some confusion as a juror is making behavioural assumptions which is taken into account as evidence in many counts?
2. We are to judge each count independently — please clarify.
3. Is it allowed to stereotype what the victim should have done prior to an alleged offence taking place in more than one count or using it against them?
4. As opposed to using patterns within counts to help decide an outcome of one count surely it is non advisable to take evidence from one count in the future to judge the count in the here and now NB count 3-9 please clarify.
5. Can the veracity of a witness statement in one count be taken into account when judging the voracity of a witness statement in another count?
The Judge has referred them to various passages in his closing summation. He has asked the jury to reach a unanimous verdict.
Rolf Harris has pleased not guilty to the indecent assault charges leveled against him.
2. Mount Buller tragedy
More details have emerged of the tragic events which led up to the death of a seven-year-old boy at the Victorian ski resort Mt Buller.