Emma and I have four kids, and have collectively paid 12 years of school fees so far with another 12 years ahead of us. That’s about $250,000 post-tax so far, which is a lot more pre-tax and a horrendous amount if you consider the compound return or cost of that money over 12 years.
We chose to send them to private school so no complaints there. But as a financial man I’ve got to say that I think the private school culture that has developed in Australia is bending us all over.
I thought the banks were at the premium end of protected monopolies, but the schools have their own unstated monopoly culture that exploits something that really shouldn’t be abused – a parent’s duty to do the right thing by their kids whatever the cost.
I’m not poor, but you’d have to be extraordinarily rich for private school fees not to condemn you to decades of extra debt. And in the face of that commitment you have to ask, does it really cost that much to educate my kids? Because I wonder whether it does, and whether the existing culture of ‘‘pay and suck it up’’ can’t be improved upon. Is more expensive really better?
In particular, should I really be paying for the scholarships of other kids just so my kid’s school can achieve a marketing coup with their academic average? Is that right? Because I don’t know that it helps my kid. In fact, it almost certainly doesn’t.
In fact, it might even hurt them, make them feel dumb or something, because if they don’t fit the marketing profile, extraordinarily, I’m paying extra for that pressure culture. I’m paying for the education of elite kids on top of my own kids. Really, is that right?
I’d rather prefer they went to a school that celebrated average achievement, quite honestly. Chucking them into a culture of ‘‘success or you’ve failed’’ only suits my kids if they happen to be very smart. They may not be.