My kids have seen explicit, masochistic sex scenes.
They’ve witnessed a horrifying terrorist hijacking, a male strip troupe getting naked and a bunch of bankers having a drug-filled orgy.
My son once saw a man weeping as his best friend was shot in the head at point-blank range.
And my daughter slept right through a battle for the ages between vampires and werewolves.
They saw all this on ordinary Monday mornings circa 2010 and 2012.
Those were my ‘Mums and Bubs’ movie days and I loved every single minute.
This week, parents and babies are watching Fifty Shades Darker at cinemas around the country. And some wowsers are trying to suggest that it’s is not a film for tiny eyes.
Listen: On This Glorious Mess, Holly and Andrew Daddo discuss whether Fifty Shades fans should leave the kids at home.
“I don’t think this is an appropriate movie to take a ‘babe in arms’… Would you take them to Saw or Alien?” Is a typical response from the nay-sayers (and a comment from the Daily Telegraph’s story).
To which I say, they’re babies. Paraphrasing the oracle Miranda from Sex And The City: “They don’t know what they’re looking at. They don’t know where their noses are!”
I understand. Like many of us, I sat through the original Fifty Shades Of Grey and took away only these thoughts – Jamie Dornan is sexier as a serial killer. Did my pre-schooler write this script? And, why is everyone protesting the gender politics of this movie? Haven’t they read the books? Wasn’t their awfulness a warning not to expect an empowering, arthouse masterpiece?
I digress. Back to the babies and their poor innocent minds. You see, for once, this is not about them.