The families of Tori Johnson and Katrina Dawson believe police commanders relied too heavily on the expertise of a psychiatrist brought in to advise the negotiators.
Katrina’s father Sandy Dawson told Four Corners the psychiatrist was too influential in police decision-making.
“He was supposed to be just an adviser to the negotiators. In fact, it seems that he was a lot more than that,” he said.
The families are critical that police did not call on specialised counter-terrorism expertise with up-to-date knowledge of Islamic State.
During the inquest, the psychiatrist admitted he was not aware of the call by IS in September 2014 for lone-wolf attacks to be carried out in their name, described by experts as a game-changer.
Despite this, the psychiatrist advised that siege gunman Man Haron Monis was not a genuine terrorist and that he was “grandstanding”.
Assistant Commissioner Mark Murdoch told the inquest he took that to mean that Monis was bluffing.
“I truly believed Monis didn’t have it in him to hurt anyone,” he said.
“When the psychiatrist declared that Monis wasn’t a terrorist, it just seemed like we were in the twilight zone,” said Katrina’s brother Angus Dawson.
“We had the Counter Terrorism Unit in charge and yet we had the psychiatrist declaring that the perpetrator wasn’t a terrorist.
“I mean, what was going on?”
Despite Monis’s history of violent crime and extremist views, police in charge of the siege expressed confidence in a peaceful outcome.
The controversial ‘trigger’ decision
During the siege, the hostages in the Lindt Cafe and their families expected police to storm the cafe in a pre-emptive rescue mission that never happened.