Yesterday, an Italian gossip magazine published photos of (pregnant) Kate Middleton in a bikini.
The Duchess of Cambridge was shown in a bright blue bikini on the cover of the magazine. St. James’s Palace said that the photos were a “clear breach of the couple’s right to privacy.”
Vanessa Raphaely is the editorial director of South Africa’s leading women’s magazines including Oprah, Cosmo and Marie Claire. She’s written about the magazine’s decision to publish the photos of Kate Middleton…
By VANESSA RAPHAELY
Tell me this, please.
Someone! Why is it worse to take photos of HRH The Duchess of Middleton frolicking in the sea, in her bikini, than it is to take pictures of any other celeb?
There has massive outrage and threats of court action against any magazine printing these snatched images of her “baby bump.”
William HQ / Buckingham palace is “outraged.”
(Gosh. They’re always bloody outraged these days.)
But something is not quite fair:
We hear the roars of that outrage from media outlets who gaily print images of pretty much everyone else on the very same page they report it. (Er. That would be YOU, Daily Mail.)
I (and I suspect that this will not be a popular POV,) think she should be treated the same as every other celeb: She’s The Primo Ultimo Celeb, after all.
Not a saint.
Not a victim.