“Why couldn’t you just keep your knees together?”
That’s what a teenage girl was asked before a courtroom full of people during the trial of the man she alleged raped her.
No, the words didn’t come from a defence lawyer for the accused trying to discredit her account of what happened.
And no, they didn’t fall out of the early 19th century.
The question came from behind the bench, from presiding judge Robin Camp. In 2014.
It wasn’t the only unsolicited advice he offered the 19-year-old homeless girl about how she could have avoided her alleged rape by a 115kg man in the bathroom of a house party.
“If you were … frightened you could have screamed”, he proffered.
“Why didn’t you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he couldn’t penetrate you?”
Judge Camp's behaviour has been compared with that of American Judge Persky who was slammed for his light treatment of Stanford rapist Brock Turner.
News.com.au reports that throughout the trial, Camp repeatedly referring to the young woman as "the accused", despite the accused in fact being a Calgary man, Alexander Scott Wagar.
To be fair, Camp did concede there might be some truth to the victim's claim the experience was painful for her, conceding that "sex is very often a challenge. Sex and pain sometimes go together, that ... that’s not necessarily a bad thing".
After dismissing the charges against Wagar as "misbehaviour" he then gave him some helpful tips for avoiding more pesky rape charges down the track: "You’ve got to be really sure that she’s saying yes … so remind yourself every time that you get involved with a girl from now on and tell your friends, okay?"