It’s the story that’s dividing many people. Did Jeffrey Spector really need to die?
The family snapshot appears to show a regular dinner out at the local curry house.
On one end of the table, 54-year-old Jeffrey Spector smiles at the camera wearing a crisp white shirt; around him, beaming teenage daughters and bespectacled friends pose before their heavily laden plates, as the precious moment is captured on camera.
Looking at the image, you’d never guess it portrayed Mr Spector’s last day on earth.
But the morning after this last supper, Spector took his life.
What’s more, his loving family knew of his plans months in advance.
The reason for this sad conclusion? Spector had an inoperable, though not terminal, tumor on his spinal cord and was facing the choice of either a risky surgery that would most likely end in him being paralysed, or living out his days in pain as he slowly deteriorated, Mail Online reports.
Opting not to live a life lacking in quality — or so he feared — Mr Spector made the difficult decision to euthanise himself.
Euthanasia is illegal in the United Kingdom, and anyone complicit in this ‘suicide’ can be considered a murderer — so the businessman chose to travel abroad to where the act is legal.
Euthanasia: Should an individual have the right to die?
That’s why, on the 20th of May, Mr Spector flew with his wife Elaine, 53, and their three daughters, Keleigh, 21, Courtney, 19, and Camryn, 15, to Switzerland.
The family spent two final days with their dad before accompanying him to the Dignitas clinic in Zurich — a facility they knew he was never going to leave.
There, on May 22, for around $16,640 (8,400 pounds), the clinic assisted Spector to die with the aid of a heavy dose of barbiturates.
Mr Spector’s decision to end his life has refueled debate surrounding right-to-die laws – particularly because the businessman’s condition was not believed to be terminal.