data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a96a4/a96a49f8967840327852459f1858cf03932f53b0" alt=""
Parenting is an exhausting job, even without the judgement, opinions and thoughts from outside voices — and when that 'outside voice' is an in-law, it becomes even more difficult.
In a recent AITA (Am I The A**hole) post on Reddit, one mother asked if she was in the wrong for banning her mother-in-law (MIL) from holding her daughter.
What makes the situation more complicated is the anonymous woman's decision was completely against her husband's wishes.
Watch: Be a Good Mum. Post continues after video.
The mother asked for advice when it became apparent her relationship with her 64-year-old MIL was strained over her four-month-old daughter.
"I've had an issue with [my MIL] since day one, (sic)" she wrote, adding that from the moment her MIL met her daughter at five days old, the way she held her baby was "ridiculous".
"[She held her] face down with her head sideways, her hand on her head [with] no other support. My daughter's legs pointed up toward [my] MIL's elbow. [She would be] swinging her back and forth fast enough to give her the startle reflex repeatedly while screaming," the mother noted. "She laughed about it [and] thought my daughter being scared was hilarious apparently."