When the washing machine agitator started to clunk in an alarming way, I knew the 18-year affair was over.
Other families have life-long pets. We have appliances we nurture for decades. The fridge must be two decades old.
But the repairman laughed when we rang: “How old? What do you expect?” The cost of fixing the old top loader, even if he could hunt down an agitator, would be equal to a new washing machine. “Get rid of it,” he said. Now I know how a pet-lover feels when told to euthanise Fluffy.
So how hard can it be to buy a new washing machine, one built to last 20 years, one just like my dear, departed – a couple of knobs, a few washing options, a quick cycle time – but more energy and water efficient? Really hard, it turned out, for me at least.
Like Debrief Daily on Facebook.
I hate too much choice so I signed up to Choice to decide for me. As luck would have it, they’d just tested more than 60 washing machines; yes 60. It’s enough to make you pine for good old central-command Communism.
Also, I texted everyone I knew on the top loader/front loader conundrum secretly hoping the majority would opt for top loader. But the majority acted as if I were an environmental vandal even to consider the water-guzzling, energy-sucking option. “Absolutely sold on front loader,” texted one friend who runs a major theatre company but was happy to take time off to discuss my problem. “Welcome to greater sustainability!”