By HOLLY WAINWRIGHT
My partner and I have two children, a mortgage and more than 10 years of history binding us together.
We love each other very much.
We are the focal point of each other’s lives, each the other’s closest friend and ally.
We share everything. His family is my family, my family is his.
But. We are just drifting along on a tide of convenience, biding time until a thoughtless, inevitable break-up, at which point we will just replace each other with someone else – just move some other ‘de-facto’ in.
At least, that’s what the Australian Government thinks.
When Kevin Andrews, Minister for Social Services said this on the weekend, he belittled the most important relationship in my life.
“What a lot of people do is drift into a relationship. They get together. They like each other. They move in together. And then they try and drift along without making a decision.
“One thing about a marriage is that it publicly denotes commitment on the part of both parties. Whereas in an informal relationship one party may be committed and one may not be.”
And not just mine. With that, around 1.1 million couples in the country had their relationships reduced.
Not everyone wants to get married.
For some of those couples, there’s a “yet” at the end of that sentence. For others, there isn’t.
Because they’ve made a choice to be committed, but not married. They’ve actively decided not to put a ring on it, for a list of reasons as varied as there are types of love.
The Minister – who, it should be noted, thinks de-facto is a perfectly acceptable living arrangement for gay couples – believes that making an active choice to be legally bonded to another person is the deciding factor of commitment, the fail-safe cure-all that stops hearts from breaking and families from imploding.