The week started with the end of a cricket test match (we lost to New Zealand on home ground for the first time in 18 years) and George Clooney was in Sydney still answering questions about his private life. The two have nothing in common right? Hold up, that’s not quite true.
Before you read the post, see how many people in this gallery you can name… You can find the answers here.
John James writes:
Let’s start with a gross generalisation. There are two types of people in this world; people who follow sport and people who follow celebrity gossip. I have no idea if this is true. I can’t back this up with facts, but let’s just run with this for a moment.
Now, I am firmly in the sports-loving camp. I view professional sport as one of the pinnacles of human achievement. I am in awe of professional athletes and what they can do with their bodies. I am amazed at their skills and abilities. I can vicariously live my fantasies of sporting glory through the sports stars I see on TV. Other people look at sport as a vanity contest between groups of self-obsessed genetic freaks. A waste of time and money that could be better spent on solving world hunger and finding a cure for cancer.
At the same time, I struggle with the media’s obsession with celebrity gossip and I can’t comprehend why anyone is actually interested in the private lives of the rich and famous. And yet, I can’t deny that many people enjoy reading and viewing celebrity gossip. It gives them a way of vicariously living the lives of money and privilege that only the rich and famous get to experience. And yet a little voice in my head says to me, shouldn’t they instead be celebrating the lives of people who try and solve world hunger and find a cure for cancer?