As measles sweeps the US, anti-vaccination campaigners have a lot to answer for. So why shouldn’t they be prosecuted for it?
Fifteen years ago, measles was all but wiped out across the USA. But this month, 70 cases across seven states have been reported — all linked to an outbreak originating in Disneyland, California last month.
Al Jazeera reports up to 1000 people, including almost 200 children, are now believed to have been exposed to the potentially fatal disease — which is so contagious that when one person has it, 90 percent of the unvaccinated people close to him or her will also become infected, according to the US Centers for Disease Control.
Is this the anti-vaxxer’s most creative scam yet?
The people who are infected are not just anti-vaxxers and their kids; what many don’t realise is that kids of pro-science, pro-vaccination parents are getting sick, too. The vaccine is only 99 percent effective, and babies under one year old also can’t receive the vaccines — so of the 34 Disneyland cases who have reported their vaccination history, six were actually vaccinated. In addition, six of the diagnosed cases in California were babies too young to be immunised, the LA Times reports.
Given the emerging public health crisis in the US, it’s clear that the anti-vaxxers have a lot to answer for. Now that their anti-science stance and dangerous ignorance is consistently making members of the general population sick, why shouldn’t they be sued?
That’s the question raised by the US website the Daily Dot asked today — and we think it’s a brilliant idea. So closer to home, asked an expert whether a legal claim against anti-vaxxers could ever be viable in Australia.