It’s said that safety is in numbers but that’s not always the case.
Recently, a 42-year-old man learned this the hard way, when he was bashed by five men outside a Melbourne hotel. Around 100 people watched the brutal attack, but not one intervened or even bothered to call an ambulance – even when one of the attackers paused to go to his car and retrieved a weapon.
The man – who police say became a target after accidentally bumping into someone – lay injured in the car park until someone drove past and found him injured in distress.
Police lamented it was a “sad state of affairs” that a large group of people who had witnessed the assault didn’t do a thing to help. And it certainly is. However, these days, it appears this is the norm.
The car park bashing is just another in a growing list of examples of what social psychologists are dubbing the ‘bystander effect’ – a phenomenon where witnesses to an act of violence passively watch on without attempting to help. What’s more, research shows the greater the number of bystanders, the less likely one will take a proactive stance.
Certain factors can influence the group’s likelihood to help, but the basic theory is that there is a diffusion of responsibility. When people note others present, they are less likely or slower to help because they believe someone else will take responsibility.
This dangerous level of apathy has led to some countries enacting laws making it illegal for bystanders to not assist in such situations. Other countries, such as Australia, also have Good Samaritan provisions to legally protect such citizens from any adverse consequences their actions may incur.