By KATE HUNTER
Are you a beardist?
Do you dislike or mistrust gentlemen with more than a Tom Selleck-esque moustache? (Gen Y and beyond may need to Google).
Apparently the Victorian Police is beardist. A new ruling says facial hair, other than a neat mo is no go. But 17 members of the Victorian are appealing to the Victorian Civil and Administration Tribunal, claiming the facial hair restrictions are discriminatory.
This, from ABC News:
“Under strict new guidelines, police are allowed to have neat moustaches, but no beards or other facial hair.
The Police Association secretary, Greg Davies, says the Chief Commissioner has the right to set presentation standards.
“The vast majority of our members are quite satisfied with the direction that’s come out,” he told ABC local radio.
“These members aren’t. They’ve got a right to pursue it through VCAT.
“While we support the members’ entitlement to go to VCAT on it, the legislation would appear to be in place that give the Chief Commissioner the authority to do it.”
While I support the rights of anyone, anywhere to argue against discrimination, reading this made me grateful that beards, their growth and maintenance are (generally) not a hassle for women. Because Lord knows we have enough to deal with. It’s bad enough having to control the hair on our heads, legs, in our armpits and around our bits.
If women had beards, the world would be a different place. There would be salons dedicated to facial hair. We’d get text messages reminding us of our six-week moustache maintenance appointment. There would be an aisle at the supermarket for beardy beauty products, and we’d compliment each other on how nicely our mutton chop sideburns are growing out. There would be colouring, curling, shaping and straightening implements. We’d wear our beards differently when on holiday.
Men rarely discuss their facial hair – unless they are just home from, say, walking the Kokoda track – a colleague might remark, ‘Geez, mate, you look like an armpit with teeth.’ But that’d be it.